From Ralph Losey:

In a major coup for The Sedona Conference and electronic discovery specialists everywhere, Associate Justice Stephen Breyer of the United States Supreme Court has weighed in on e-discovery and written the preface to a special supplement of the Sedona Conference Journal, The Sedona Conference Journal, Vol. 10 Supplement, Fall 2009. Here is an excerpt from the Preface by Justice Breyer:

[The articles in this Supplement] suggest that if participants in the legal system act cooperatively in the fact-finding process, more cases will be able to be resolved on their merits more efficiently, and this will help ensure that the courts are not open only to the wealthy. I believe this to be a laudable goal, and hope that readers of this Journal will consider the articles carefully in connection with their efforts to try cases…

From Jennifer H. Rearden and Farrah Pepper in the New York Law Journal:

The Cooperation Proclamation asks a timeless question: Can’t we all just get along? Although this pronouncement by The Sedona Conference is only a few pages long, its drafters seek no less than a “paradigm shift for the discovery process.” Specifically, the Cooperation Proclamation encourages “a national drive to promote open and forthright information sharing, dialogue (internal and external), training and the development of practical tools to facilitate cooperative, collaborative, transparent discovery.” On the theory that overzealous discovery costs too much and yields too little, the Cooperation Proclamation aims to curb the knee-jerk and often counterproductive aggression sometimes exhibited by counsel in discovery. In this respect, its goal is the same as that of Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: to promote the “just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action…”