<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Legal Offshoring Slowly Making Its Way Back &#8220;On Shore?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gabesguide.com/2010/02/18/is-legal-offshoring-slowly-making-its-way-back-on-shore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gabesguide.com/2010/02/18/is-legal-offshoring-slowly-making-its-way-back-on-shore/</link>
	<description>to e-Discovery &#38; Other Stuff...(Please bear with me as I revamp this site.) Email: Gabe@GabesGuide.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 12:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jchiang</title>
		<link>http://gabesguide.com/2010/02/18/is-legal-offshoring-slowly-making-its-way-back-on-shore/comment-page-1/#comment-188</link>
		<dc:creator>jchiang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 22:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gabesguide.com/?p=715#comment-188</guid>
		<description>I find it strange that the response to failures in offshoring is to onshore.  Has anyone actually looked at why offshoring of legal processes actually fails?

I would speculate that there have been little to no processes put in place to allow for intelligent and cost-effective collaboration with your legal offshore partner.

Or that as part of a political issue or provincial thinking, a manager would onshore in order to &quot;closely manage&quot; activities.

The fact is that the world is very global and has gotten flatter in the past decade.  There should no longer be an issue about collaboration across borders.  Frequently, offshoring also provides benefits in terms of agility (ramp up/ramp down), so that you can more exactly match cost/supply to demand.

Feel free to look at my blog on Agile Offshoring ... agileoffshoring.blogspot.com or website http://www.neocontext.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it strange that the response to failures in offshoring is to onshore.  Has anyone actually looked at why offshoring of legal processes actually fails?</p>
<p>I would speculate that there have been little to no processes put in place to allow for intelligent and cost-effective collaboration with your legal offshore partner.</p>
<p>Or that as part of a political issue or provincial thinking, a manager would onshore in order to &#8220;closely manage&#8221; activities.</p>
<p>The fact is that the world is very global and has gotten flatter in the past decade.  There should no longer be an issue about collaboration across borders.  Frequently, offshoring also provides benefits in terms of agility (ramp up/ramp down), so that you can more exactly match cost/supply to demand.</p>
<p>Feel free to look at my blog on Agile Offshoring &#8230; agileoffshoring.blogspot.com or website <a href="http://www.neocontext.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.neocontext.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

